A good example of the media’s ineptitude.

Here’s a good example of the media’s ineptitude at critical thinking and providing valid information to the people. Start by watching this video of a news report: Fuel from Salt Water! Yes it does sound crazy, no it won’t change the world.

The reporter, obviously having no understanding of basic high-school science, buys the whole thing hook, line and sinker. First, he seems impressed by the fact that the radio beam cannot be felt by a human hand but it makes a fluorescent tube glow. Of course you can’t feel the beam you moron, it’s electromagnetic energy, radio waves. Do you feel the radio waves emanating from your cell phones and traversing your brain? And of course it will make the fluorescent tube glow, that what’s the phosphors inside the tube are designed to do, glow in the presence of energy!

Then for the “piece de resistance”, he aims his concentrated radio beam at salt water and causes some of the hydrogen and oxygen to separate into individual gases. The resulting mix of the two gases is called propergol and it is highly flammable. In fact, it often used as rocket fuel, so no wonder it can generate high temperatures! Again, anybody with basic high-school chemistry would recognize this for what it is: a very inefficient way of separating the elements of water, similar to the electrolysis of water experiment you should all have done in high-school. And armed with high-school physics, you would also recognize that it takes more energy to perform that separation then the resulting gases can provide. Therefore, this transformation consumes more energy than it produces! Oh, and by the way, water is not “one of the most abundant elements“, but it is composed of two elements H and O.

But not only does the reporter fail to recognize these basic facts of life, the anchor totally falls for it too! She oohs and ahhs and declares: “I want it!” Gee, why not just say “Hallelujah, our world is saved!”. This is completely irresponsible news reporting. The really sad part though is that the general population has no more understanding of basic science than these morons do, and when this “miracle” fails to materialize, they will once again blame the oil industry for killing it! Shame on you WKYC, you should know better. I suggest you all write to these idiots and tell them to smarten up.

Here’s another thing that science can teach you folks: critical thinking! Not only does it arm you with the knowledge necessary to understand the basic principles behind natural phenomenons, but it also teaches you how to think for yourself and separate facts from wishful thinking.

Given this abysmal lack of the most basic science education in the general population, especially in America, combined with the even more disastrous and irresponsible news media, it is no wonder that so many people think the way they do and believe in so many superstitions and fairy tales. How can you understand global warming when you don’t understand the basic facts of chemistry and physics behind it? How can you understand evolution when you don’t understand the basic facts of biology and probabilities behind it? How can the media report fairly and accurately on those important issues when they don’t understand them either? When you don’t understand the basic science, these issues become a matter of faith, a matter of you believe the most.

A nation that is trying to push science out of the classroom and is constantly bombarded by inept news reporting and false information, is a nation that is doomed.

6 Responses to “A good example of the media’s ineptitude.”

  1. on 09 Jan 2008 at 3:53 pm The Atavist

    so… I guess a perpetual motion machine is out of the question, then. Next you will be telling me there is no Santa Claus, no Easter Bunny, no Tooth Fairy.

    I agree that there are failings in education, but I lay most of the blame for this deplorable situation on intellectual laziness. Thinking is too much trouble for most people. Wish it weren’t so.

  2. on 09 Jan 2008 at 10:39 pm sduford

    You are right that intellectual laziness is part of it. People don’t read much. But if they don’t learn science in high school, they are also not given critical thinking skills. That’s why today’s population is so gullible.

  3. on 20 Jan 2008 at 7:01 pm Galt-in-Da-Box

    You can’t really understand science - or anything else - unless you’re willing to read, and a person who won’t read inevitably turns out as ignorant if not more so, than the person who can’t.
    American public education is a political football: It gets kicked around, handed off, and passed (like the buck) because there’s no responsibility, no accountability, and teachers are not allowed to keep the peace in their classrooms, because of a policy Our Dear Leader has enacted I like to call No Sluggard Left Behind.
    Learning is serious business. Those who are not serious about it should not be the pace-setters for those who are.

  4. on 21 Jan 2008 at 9:25 am sduford

    Agreed.

  5. on 29 Jan 2008 at 3:50 pm Martine

    waow,
    je viens de lire ton commentaire du 9 janvier sur l’incompétence des médias, tu en avais gros sur la patate !
    Tàfait d’accord avec toi, mais comment faire lorsque je n’ai pas les bases requises pour comprendre tout ce qu’on m’envoie ? Je suis en train de perdre mon individualité et mon habilité à penser par moi-même à force de m’en remettre toujours à toi ou à JC… et je n’ai pas le courage de me replonger dans mes livres de science !?
    De plus, regarder Nova et PBS ne suffisent pas à me libérer du wishfull thinking, qui est une notion toute nouvelle pour moi. Mais j’y travaille !
    Peut-être devrait-on fonder une formation continue pour adultes qui nous aiderait à combler nos lacunes. Vas jeter un coup d’oeil sur ce site, http://www.edutopia.org/

    Georges Lucas est à la tête d’une fondation qui justement donne des outils et moyens aux écoles et profs d’enseigner cette base dont tu parles.
    Project-base learning, technology integration, social and emotional intelligence etc…
    Y a de l’espoir !!!

  6. on 29 Jan 2008 at 7:31 pm sduford

    Bonjour Martine! En effet, j’étais plutot furieux!

    Je crois que ton idée est très bonne, peut-être que je pourrais faire ca comme projet de retraite!

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply